Template talk:PvE Atlas r6: Difference between revisions

From MC Public Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
I think these categories are unclear what should be where. I think it would be easier to group them northeast (+,+), southeast (+,-), southwest (-,-) and northwest (-,+). [[User:Purine|Purine]] 03:21, 26 January 2012 (CST)
I think these categories are unclear what should be where. I think it would be easier to group them northeast (+,+), southeast (+,-), southwest (-,-) and northwest (-,+). [[User:Purine|Purine]] 03:21, 26 January 2012 (CST)
:Good point... I had just been going off whichever coordinate had the greater absolute value. Here's what the categories would look like grouped that way:
:Good point... I had just been going off whichever coordinate had the greater absolute value. Here's what the categories would look like grouped that way:
:{|
:{| style="background:#e0e0e0; border:solid #999999 1px"
|- valign="top"
|- valign="top"
| ''Northwest (-x, -z)''
| ''Northwest (-x, -z)''
Line 46: Line 46:
* [[La Grès Cathedral]] -250, 250
* [[La Grès Cathedral]] -250, 250
* [[Draco]] @ -160, 280
* [[Draco]] @ -160, 280
|| Southeast (+x, +z)
|| ''Southeast (+x, +z)''
* '''[[New Argoth]] @ 1500, 0'''
* '''[[New Argoth]] @ 1500, 0'''
* '''[[Wellspring]] @ 900, 700'''
* '''[[Wellspring]] @ 900, 700'''
Line 70: Line 70:
<!-- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -->
<!-- xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -->
:One downside though, settlements right near the compass points sort of get lumped into a category that doesn't really describe their location... same problem that already exists with the current grouping. For comparison's sake, I tried grouping them in 9 sectors:
:One downside though, settlements right near the compass points sort of get lumped into a category that doesn't really describe their location... same problem that already exists with the current grouping. For comparison's sake, I tried grouping them in 9 sectors:
:{|
:{| style="background:#e0e0e0; border:solid #999999 1px"
|- valign="top"
|- valign="top"
| ''Northwest (-x, -z)''
| ''Northwest (-x, -z)''
Line 96: Line 96:
* [[Gobias]] @ ?, ?
* [[Gobias]] @ ?, ?
|- valign="top"
|- valign="top"
| West (-x)
| ''West (-x)''
* '''[[Topaz]] @ -1500, 0'''
* '''[[Topaz]] @ -1500, 0'''
* [[Fountain]] @ -2936, -365
* [[Fountain]] @ -2936, -365

Revision as of 15:41, 26 January 2012

I think these categories are unclear what should be where. I think it would be easier to group them northeast (+,+), southeast (+,-), southwest (-,-) and northwest (-,+). Purine 03:21, 26 January 2012 (CST)

Good point... I had just been going off whichever coordinate had the greater absolute value. Here's what the categories would look like grouped that way:
Northwest (-x, -z) Northeast (+x, -z) Southwest (-x, +z) Southeast (+x, +z)
One downside though, settlements right near the compass points sort of get lumped into a category that doesn't really describe their location... same problem that already exists with the current grouping. For comparison's sake, I tried grouping them in 9 sectors:
Northwest (-x, -z) North (-z) Northeast (+x, -z)
West (-x) Central (<300 blocks from spawn) East (+x)
Southwest (-x, +z) South (+z) Southeast (+x, +z)
Does a decent job grouping settlements into regions, but the end result is a rather cluttered layout. --Bencvt 09:34, 26 January 2012 (CST)